<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Open thread: Other people are not on fluffcation</title>
	<atom:link href="http://kateharding.net/2009/11/04/open-thread-other-people-are-not-on-fluffcation/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://kateharding.net/2009/11/04/open-thread-other-people-are-not-on-fluffcation/</link>
	<description>2007-2010</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 15 Jul 2010 02:13:02 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: thegirlfrommarz</title>
		<link>http://kateharding.net/2009/11/04/open-thread-other-people-are-not-on-fluffcation/#comment-120171</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[thegirlfrommarz]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Nov 2009 11:38:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://kateharding.net/?p=3862#comment-120171</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Meems - just wanted to second what Zenoodle said about your comments at WATRD making it readable. I am really glad someone is making the reasonable arguments over there.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Meems &#8211; just wanted to second what Zenoodle said about your comments at WATRD making it readable. I am really glad someone is making the reasonable arguments over there.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Zenoodle</title>
		<link>http://kateharding.net/2009/11/04/open-thread-other-people-are-not-on-fluffcation/#comment-120140</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Zenoodle]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 08 Nov 2009 02:07:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://kateharding.net/?p=3862#comment-120140</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Thanks for that link Darcy... I&#039;m so upset that someone *stole* the dress at the end though! :-(]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for that link Darcy&#8230; I&#8217;m so upset that someone *stole* the dress at the end though! :-(</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Darcy</title>
		<link>http://kateharding.net/2009/11/04/open-thread-other-people-are-not-on-fluffcation/#comment-120119</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Darcy]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 07 Nov 2009 17:02:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://kateharding.net/?p=3862#comment-120119</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The uniform project is like a fashion-focused version of the Little Brown Dress project, a project I find more inspiring, but in different ways: http://www.littlebrowndress.com/]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The uniform project is like a fashion-focused version of the Little Brown Dress project, a project I find more inspiring, but in different ways: <a href="http://www.littlebrowndress.com/" rel="nofollow">http://www.littlebrowndress.com/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Meems</title>
		<link>http://kateharding.net/2009/11/04/open-thread-other-people-are-not-on-fluffcation/#comment-120104</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Meems]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 07 Nov 2009 06:47:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://kateharding.net/?p=3862#comment-120104</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[@Zenoodle, I always said it that way and then started to wonder if it was supposed to be &quot;ze [the] noodle.&quot;

Glad someone appreciates my comments :)]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Zenoodle, I always said it that way and then started to wonder if it was supposed to be &#8220;ze [the] noodle.&#8221;</p>
<p>Glad someone appreciates my comments :)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Zenoodle</title>
		<link>http://kateharding.net/2009/11/04/open-thread-other-people-are-not-on-fluffcation/#comment-120092</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Zenoodle]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 07 Nov 2009 01:45:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://kateharding.net/?p=3862#comment-120092</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Meems, you&#039;ve kind of hit on the inspiration behind my screen name. :-) Also, I guess we can probably discount a career in politics for me off the back of how particular posts and comments at WATRD have been affecting me - good to know though! And hats off to you for your patience - I think your comments there are really important and valuable... My frothing at the mouth there is probably less so!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Meems, you&#8217;ve kind of hit on the inspiration behind my screen name. :-) Also, I guess we can probably discount a career in politics for me off the back of how particular posts and comments at WATRD have been affecting me &#8211; good to know though! And hats off to you for your patience &#8211; I think your comments there are really important and valuable&#8230; My frothing at the mouth there is probably less so!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Meems</title>
		<link>http://kateharding.net/2009/11/04/open-thread-other-people-are-not-on-fluffcation/#comment-120087</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Meems]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Nov 2009 23:57:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://kateharding.net/?p=3862#comment-120087</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[@Zenoodle &amp; MezzoSherri, I study religion and politics and plan to work in politics for a living, so I think I&#039;m fairly inured to the kind of ridiculousness that gets posted on WATRD sometimes.  I do think that mamaV has good intentions, but she&#039;s very stuck in her own perceptions and outlook and has trouble seeing things from another angle.  I&#039;m also not totally sure she realizes how alienating her posts sound when she calls out moderated comments.  The two new contributors, Marsha and Kim, have potential, though, and I hope they start participating in discussions more.

Oh, and Zenoodle, two things: I think your posts did go through; I&#039;m pretty sure I saw them up.  Also, for some reason I always read your name as Zen-noodle.  Hmmm.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Zenoodle &amp; MezzoSherri, I study religion and politics and plan to work in politics for a living, so I think I&#8217;m fairly inured to the kind of ridiculousness that gets posted on WATRD sometimes.  I do think that mamaV has good intentions, but she&#8217;s very stuck in her own perceptions and outlook and has trouble seeing things from another angle.  I&#8217;m also not totally sure she realizes how alienating her posts sound when she calls out moderated comments.  The two new contributors, Marsha and Kim, have potential, though, and I hope they start participating in discussions more.</p>
<p>Oh, and Zenoodle, two things: I think your posts did go through; I&#8217;m pretty sure I saw them up.  Also, for some reason I always read your name as Zen-noodle.  Hmmm.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MezzoSherri</title>
		<link>http://kateharding.net/2009/11/04/open-thread-other-people-are-not-on-fluffcation/#comment-120064</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[MezzoSherri]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Nov 2009 19:12:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://kateharding.net/?p=3862#comment-120064</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Zenoodle: Your comments inspired me to take another look at WATRD, which has caused me once again to feel depressed about humanity. Meems, you rock for continuing the conversation there but I am just too overwhelmed by 3D life to be able to take on that little piece of the interverse.

Anyhow, thanks for the baby hedgehog pics. I needed the pick me up.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Zenoodle: Your comments inspired me to take another look at WATRD, which has caused me once again to feel depressed about humanity. Meems, you rock for continuing the conversation there but I am just too overwhelmed by 3D life to be able to take on that little piece of the interverse.</p>
<p>Anyhow, thanks for the baby hedgehog pics. I needed the pick me up.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Zenoodle</title>
		<link>http://kateharding.net/2009/11/04/open-thread-other-people-are-not-on-fluffcation/#comment-120060</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Zenoodle]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Nov 2009 18:15:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://kateharding.net/?p=3862#comment-120060</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&#039;if that&#039;s pretty true&#039;...??? Ye gads I need to sleep!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8216;if that&#8217;s pretty true&#8217;&#8230;??? Ye gads I need to sleep!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Zenoodle</title>
		<link>http://kateharding.net/2009/11/04/open-thread-other-people-are-not-on-fluffcation/#comment-120059</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Zenoodle]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Nov 2009 18:14:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://kateharding.net/?p=3862#comment-120059</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Hi Meems, I saw you over there fighting the good fight -- it actually was probably the thing which prevented my head totally exploding! I#&#039;m just not brave enough / haven&#039;t saved enough sanity points. I tried a bit yesterday -- probs gone into moderation or been deleted, haven&#039;t checked yet because then I&#039;ll inevitably read more there and can&#039;t deal with it today. It feels like such a negative space to me. It seems like a good number of commenters over there are actually uncomfortable with some of the articles&#039; tones -- thinking specifically of the one which was like &#039;yet another FA activist&#039; etc. I just found it too galling to see MamaV saying she wants to create this great space, no us and them, etc, and then creates a big &#039;us and them&#039; scenario by tarring a whole non-monolithic group with one brush. And that she seems, according to some commenters, to have *edited* their comments rather than moderated them to not show up... if that&#039;s pretty true, it&#039;s also pretty odd. I don&#039;t know... some good stuff over there but it hurts my brain too much when I read a lot of the commentaries and (it seems) whenever I read anything from the &#039;privilege=yawn already&#039; MamaV. 

The funny thing is that, although here I waited a while to comment and was nervous at first, I actually appreciated that and the comments policy a lot more. I realised when I looked at things I&#039;d commented elsewhere in the past that I was Not Getting some important stuff, and without that space to pause and think, I would just write them on down. Here, if I write something problematic I&#039;ll get called on it, but in a fair and clear way... At WATRD it seems there is an atmosphere of people wondering &#039;who&#039;s next&#039; to get jumped on in just the way they&#039;re making out happens here a lot (and I have been reading here for nearly a year now and have never seen someone get unreasonably jumped on -- there&#039;s always a reason which is well thought out and the person is given justification with reference to the comments policy. Wagh. The fact this space isn&#039;t a &#039;101 over and over again&#039; space is good in my opinion -- there are links to 101 spaces, there *are discussions of it, and the posts and commentaries here help to contextualise the 101 stuff and also raises the game -- I think I learn more here by shushing and listening (with occasional comment splurges) than I have done in an awful lot of other places with less strict comments policies!

Agh that didn&#039;t need to be so long winded. Accidentally stayed up til 6am reading on the internets and being upset at all the wrongness on it, so I only have myself to blame for shattered-ness now!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Meems, I saw you over there fighting the good fight &#8212; it actually was probably the thing which prevented my head totally exploding! I#&#8217;m just not brave enough / haven&#8217;t saved enough sanity points. I tried a bit yesterday &#8212; probs gone into moderation or been deleted, haven&#8217;t checked yet because then I&#8217;ll inevitably read more there and can&#8217;t deal with it today. It feels like such a negative space to me. It seems like a good number of commenters over there are actually uncomfortable with some of the articles&#8217; tones &#8212; thinking specifically of the one which was like &#8216;yet another FA activist&#8217; etc. I just found it too galling to see MamaV saying she wants to create this great space, no us and them, etc, and then creates a big &#8216;us and them&#8217; scenario by tarring a whole non-monolithic group with one brush. And that she seems, according to some commenters, to have *edited* their comments rather than moderated them to not show up&#8230; if that&#8217;s pretty true, it&#8217;s also pretty odd. I don&#8217;t know&#8230; some good stuff over there but it hurts my brain too much when I read a lot of the commentaries and (it seems) whenever I read anything from the &#8216;privilege=yawn already&#8217; MamaV. </p>
<p>The funny thing is that, although here I waited a while to comment and was nervous at first, I actually appreciated that and the comments policy a lot more. I realised when I looked at things I&#8217;d commented elsewhere in the past that I was Not Getting some important stuff, and without that space to pause and think, I would just write them on down. Here, if I write something problematic I&#8217;ll get called on it, but in a fair and clear way&#8230; At WATRD it seems there is an atmosphere of people wondering &#8216;who&#8217;s next&#8217; to get jumped on in just the way they&#8217;re making out happens here a lot (and I have been reading here for nearly a year now and have never seen someone get unreasonably jumped on &#8212; there&#8217;s always a reason which is well thought out and the person is given justification with reference to the comments policy. Wagh. The fact this space isn&#8217;t a &#8217;101 over and over again&#8217; space is good in my opinion &#8212; there are links to 101 spaces, there *are discussions of it, and the posts and commentaries here help to contextualise the 101 stuff and also raises the game &#8212; I think I learn more here by shushing and listening (with occasional comment splurges) than I have done in an awful lot of other places with less strict comments policies!</p>
<p>Agh that didn&#8217;t need to be so long winded. Accidentally stayed up til 6am reading on the internets and being upset at all the wrongness on it, so I only have myself to blame for shattered-ness now!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Meems</title>
		<link>http://kateharding.net/2009/11/04/open-thread-other-people-are-not-on-fluffcation/#comment-120058</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Meems]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Nov 2009 17:48:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://kateharding.net/?p=3862#comment-120058</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[BTW, I just discovered this blog over at PsychCentral.  I was a bit surprised to see it there, but it seems good so far: http://blogs.psychcentral.com/weightless/category/body-image/

And I do still post over at WATRD.  I don&#039;t claim to speak for anyone else in FA but myself, but I think it&#039;s worth having a presence on a blog that wants to deal with body image issues...if you can deal with the accusations of lying (what, is it that hard to believe that I&#039;m healthy?) and some very glaring ignorance about experiential differences between fat and thin women.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>BTW, I just discovered this blog over at PsychCentral.  I was a bit surprised to see it there, but it seems good so far: <a href="http://blogs.psychcentral.com/weightless/category/body-image/" rel="nofollow">http://blogs.psychcentral.com/weightless/category/body-image/</a></p>
<p>And I do still post over at WATRD.  I don&#8217;t claim to speak for anyone else in FA but myself, but I think it&#8217;s worth having a presence on a blog that wants to deal with body image issues&#8230;if you can deal with the accusations of lying (what, is it that hard to believe that I&#8217;m healthy?) and some very glaring ignorance about experiential differences between fat and thin women.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

