<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Quick Hit: Follow the Money</title>
	<atom:link href="http://kateharding.net/2008/05/12/quick-hit-follow-the-money/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://kateharding.net/2008/05/12/quick-hit-follow-the-money/</link>
	<description>2007-2010</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 15 Jul 2010 02:13:02 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: viv</title>
		<link>http://kateharding.net/2008/05/12/quick-hit-follow-the-money/#comment-54753</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[viv]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 May 2008 00:33:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://kateharding.wordpress.com/?p=1417#comment-54753</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I don&#039;t trust any expert opinion or studies unless I&#039;ve see the counter arguments and the detail of the studies. Many reputable people have all kinds of reasons for taking the postion that they do and some are unconscious. Understanding where people get their money clarifies much about their position on an issue but doesn&#039;t necessarily mean that they are wrong.

Also many medical facts may apply to certain segment fo population and not to others. It behooves each and every one of us to test and see if procedures and medications are suitable for oneself.  Rule of thumb is if it sounds counter intuitive and weird, do more research and be very very scared (skeptical).]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t trust any expert opinion or studies unless I&#8217;ve see the counter arguments and the detail of the studies. Many reputable people have all kinds of reasons for taking the postion that they do and some are unconscious. Understanding where people get their money clarifies much about their position on an issue but doesn&#8217;t necessarily mean that they are wrong.</p>
<p>Also many medical facts may apply to certain segment fo population and not to others. It behooves each and every one of us to test and see if procedures and medications are suitable for oneself.  Rule of thumb is if it sounds counter intuitive and weird, do more research and be very very scared (skeptical).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Loveandlight</title>
		<link>http://kateharding.net/2008/05/12/quick-hit-follow-the-money/#comment-54750</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Loveandlight]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 May 2008 21:03:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://kateharding.wordpress.com/?p=1417#comment-54750</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[And this certainly does touch upon some studies about overweightness that prop up societal prejudices.  If it were possible to take large amounts of fat-weight off and keep it off, I really think the majority of us here reading this blog would have done it and would continue doing it.  You would think that our family and neighbors and cow-irkers should be willing to take our word for it that lost weight from dieting simply doesn&#039;t stay lost, and that loss stops even happening after a certain point.  

But no, we &quot;didn&#039;t try hard enough&quot;.  So how much is enough?  When we&#039;re spending all our own time exercising and eating 1500-calorie-a-day diets that allow only 60 grams of fat a day and being Biafra-baby hungry all day long as a result?  I know there are people who can live on that little, and good for them because their grocery bills must be pretty low, but really, those people are a minority.

900-1,000 calories-a-day with thirty grams of fat is considered a brink-of-starvation diet, to give you some perspective.  I&#039;m sure a lot of our Dude Nation trolls would say, &quot;Then you should eat &lt;b&gt;that&lt;/b&gt; diet, you fucking rhinos!&quot;  And these enlightened individuals would probably last about a week on the 1500-a-day diet, I tend to think!

I took a look at the &quot;Lean Cuisines&quot; in the freezer at the grocery store a few days ago.  The average package is about 250 calories with about four or five grams of fat.  If people are actually eating those, I hope they are eating something else in addition to those hyper-skimpy portions.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>And this certainly does touch upon some studies about overweightness that prop up societal prejudices.  If it were possible to take large amounts of fat-weight off and keep it off, I really think the majority of us here reading this blog would have done it and would continue doing it.  You would think that our family and neighbors and cow-irkers should be willing to take our word for it that lost weight from dieting simply doesn&#8217;t stay lost, and that loss stops even happening after a certain point.  </p>
<p>But no, we &#8220;didn&#8217;t try hard enough&#8221;.  So how much is enough?  When we&#8217;re spending all our own time exercising and eating 1500-calorie-a-day diets that allow only 60 grams of fat a day and being Biafra-baby hungry all day long as a result?  I know there are people who can live on that little, and good for them because their grocery bills must be pretty low, but really, those people are a minority.</p>
<p>900-1,000 calories-a-day with thirty grams of fat is considered a brink-of-starvation diet, to give you some perspective.  I&#8217;m sure a lot of our Dude Nation trolls would say, &#8220;Then you should eat <b>that</b> diet, you fucking rhinos!&#8221;  And these enlightened individuals would probably last about a week on the 1500-a-day diet, I tend to think!</p>
<p>I took a look at the &#8220;Lean Cuisines&#8221; in the freezer at the grocery store a few days ago.  The average package is about 250 calories with about four or five grams of fat.  If people are actually eating those, I hope they are eating something else in addition to those hyper-skimpy portions.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Caitlin</title>
		<link>http://kateharding.net/2008/05/12/quick-hit-follow-the-money/#comment-54749</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Caitlin]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 May 2008 20:05:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://kateharding.wordpress.com/?p=1417#comment-54749</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[RUN FOR YOUR LIVES!!!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>RUN FOR YOUR LIVES!!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: kate217</title>
		<link>http://kateharding.net/2008/05/12/quick-hit-follow-the-money/#comment-54746</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[kate217]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 May 2008 18:53:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://kateharding.wordpress.com/?p=1417#comment-54746</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[42]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>42</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: phledge</title>
		<link>http://kateharding.net/2008/05/12/quick-hit-follow-the-money/#comment-54745</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[phledge]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 May 2008 18:24:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://kateharding.wordpress.com/?p=1417#comment-54745</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;i&gt;I don’t think science is ever conclusive. I think it seeks to explain things.&lt;/i&gt;

I had a favorite high school physics teacher who liked to say something to the effect of &quot;science ain&#039;t about the answers so much as the questions.  If you got all the answers, there&#039;d be no science.&quot;  And one of my favorite unattributed quotes is &quot;Questions without answers are far less dangerous than answers without questions.&quot;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>I don’t think science is ever conclusive. I think it seeks to explain things.</i></p>
<p>I had a favorite high school physics teacher who liked to say something to the effect of &#8220;science ain&#8217;t about the answers so much as the questions.  If you got all the answers, there&#8217;d be no science.&#8221;  And one of my favorite unattributed quotes is &#8220;Questions without answers are far less dangerous than answers without questions.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SjC</title>
		<link>http://kateharding.net/2008/05/12/quick-hit-follow-the-money/#comment-54744</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[SjC]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 May 2008 16:27:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://kateharding.wordpress.com/?p=1417#comment-54744</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;i&gt;Are you telling me tampons DON’T contain asbestos, killedbyllamas?&lt;/i&gt;
&lt;i&gt;There’s a “surprise me cunt” joke in here somewhere, I know it.&lt;/i&gt;
Blah blah blah firecrotch joke in here somewhere blah blah blah...]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>Are you telling me tampons DON’T contain asbestos, killedbyllamas?</i><br />
<i>There’s a “surprise me cunt” joke in here somewhere, I know it.</i><br />
Blah blah blah firecrotch joke in here somewhere blah blah blah&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cindy</title>
		<link>http://kateharding.net/2008/05/12/quick-hit-follow-the-money/#comment-54743</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Cindy]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 May 2008 16:21:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://kateharding.wordpress.com/?p=1417#comment-54743</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[There is reliable, critical science and medical journalism happening -- I&#039;ve been seeing a lot of it on the AP wire. I don&#039;t know how much those stories are being selected, though.

I&#039;m an editor, and I dropped several columns in the last three years because I started checking their sources. I was really concerned how indie columnists were actually misreporting the findings of the studies - and making them sound conclusive.

I don&#039;t think science is ever conclusive. I think it seeks to explain things.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There is reliable, critical science and medical journalism happening &#8212; I&#8217;ve been seeing a lot of it on the AP wire. I don&#8217;t know how much those stories are being selected, though.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m an editor, and I dropped several columns in the last three years because I started checking their sources. I was really concerned how indie columnists were actually misreporting the findings of the studies &#8211; and making them sound conclusive.</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t think science is ever conclusive. I think it seeks to explain things.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Arwen</title>
		<link>http://kateharding.net/2008/05/12/quick-hit-follow-the-money/#comment-54730</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Arwen]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 May 2008 05:49:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://kateharding.wordpress.com/?p=1417#comment-54730</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Asbestos? Really? 

People will believe damn near anything with a PhD attached to it. Except evolution.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Asbestos? Really? </p>
<p>People will believe damn near anything with a PhD attached to it. Except evolution.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nikki</title>
		<link>http://kateharding.net/2008/05/12/quick-hit-follow-the-money/#comment-54729</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Nikki]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 May 2008 04:33:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://kateharding.wordpress.com/?p=1417#comment-54729</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Whew! Thanks, Phledge. The claim of asbestos and the refutation of the claim were entirely new to me.  Now, I can save the money I would have spent on all-natural tampons and spend it on wine.  I love wine.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Whew! Thanks, Phledge. The claim of asbestos and the refutation of the claim were entirely new to me.  Now, I can save the money I would have spent on all-natural tampons and spend it on wine.  I love wine.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: killedbyllamas</title>
		<link>http://kateharding.net/2008/05/12/quick-hit-follow-the-money/#comment-54726</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[killedbyllamas]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 May 2008 03:19:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://kateharding.wordpress.com/?p=1417#comment-54726</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;em&gt;Are you telling me tampons DON’T contain asbestos, killedbyllamas?

There’s a “surprise me cunt” joke in here somewhere, I know it.&lt;/em&gt;
Absolutely.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><em>Are you telling me tampons DON’T contain asbestos, killedbyllamas?</p>
<p>There’s a “surprise me cunt” joke in here somewhere, I know it.</em><br />
Absolutely.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

