<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Marilyn&#8217;s Law</title>
	<atom:link href="http://kateharding.net/2007/11/13/marilyns-law/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://kateharding.net/2007/11/13/marilyns-law/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 04:49:24 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Jennifer</title>
		<link>http://kateharding.net/2007/11/13/marilyns-law/#comment-59641</link>
		<dc:creator>Jennifer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 29 Jun 2008 18:51:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://kateharding.net/2007/11/13/marilyns-law/#comment-59641</guid>
		<description>Who cares what size Marilyn Monroe was! The thing I thought was beautiful about her is this: Marylin did strength training. That&#039;s right, she lifted weights. How unfeminine! And so, to did Betty Page--who, in fact, lifted a weight every time she picked up her purse, because, if  the legend &#039;s true, she kept a brick in it, to ward off mashers. The thought of a woman who can take care of herself--in whatever way you choose to define that--is hot. 

By the way, even if you&#039;re like me--a big and not terribly limber gal--you can lift weights, too, without ever touching one of those ugly little barbells. Those of us who have had any exposure to Tai Ch&#039;i know that lifting any part of your body can be just as much work as lifting a barbell. One of the toughest yoga exercises I know of consists of lying flat on your back, raising in turn each of your limbs and your head a mere inch off the floor, and holding it as long as you&#039;re able. Strength training can be simply a matter of how you move: what muscles you use, where the effort is placed, what parts of your body you relax, and how slowly you go Sitting in a chair and pushing your feet against the floor or lifting an arm or leg can be a strength-training exercise. Everyone who has a body of any kind at all has a full set of gym equipment. After all, it ain&#039;t what you got; it&#039;s how you use it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Who cares what size Marilyn Monroe was! The thing I thought was beautiful about her is this: Marylin did strength training. That&#8217;s right, she lifted weights. How unfeminine! And so, to did Betty Page&#8211;who, in fact, lifted a weight every time she picked up her purse, because, if  the legend &#8217;s true, she kept a brick in it, to ward off mashers. The thought of a woman who can take care of herself&#8211;in whatever way you choose to define that&#8211;is hot. </p>
<p>By the way, even if you&#8217;re like me&#8211;a big and not terribly limber gal&#8211;you can lift weights, too, without ever touching one of those ugly little barbells. Those of us who have had any exposure to Tai Ch&#8217;i know that lifting any part of your body can be just as much work as lifting a barbell. One of the toughest yoga exercises I know of consists of lying flat on your back, raising in turn each of your limbs and your head a mere inch off the floor, and holding it as long as you&#8217;re able. Strength training can be simply a matter of how you move: what muscles you use, where the effort is placed, what parts of your body you relax, and how slowly you go Sitting in a chair and pushing your feet against the floor or lifting an arm or leg can be a strength-training exercise. Everyone who has a body of any kind at all has a full set of gym equipment. After all, it ain&#8217;t what you got; it&#8217;s how you use it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bunny Mazonas</title>
		<link>http://kateharding.net/2007/11/13/marilyns-law/#comment-23712</link>
		<dc:creator>Bunny Mazonas</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Nov 2007 01:12:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://kateharding.net/2007/11/13/marilyns-law/#comment-23712</guid>
		<description>I guess this is kinda connected with the whole vanity sizing thing.

I really, really hate the way that clothing shops fold or tie clothing to make it as small as possible.  It&#039;s hard enough when I can&#039;t tell what size it is due to non-standardised labels, I also have to untie items or remove them from their hangers altogether to see how big they really are against me.  That has to be a vanity thing, too... picking up a top in &quot;your size&quot; and holding it up and it looks so small and slim!

Oh, and the sizing thing that seems to go on at the moment where &quot;larger size&quot; means &quot;wider but exactly to scale&quot; and gives no thought to, for example, larger/deeper breast cleavage or a longer arse, meaning that it fits fine width-wise but either your chest is cut in half or your buttocks bulge out of the top.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I guess this is kinda connected with the whole vanity sizing thing.</p>
<p>I really, really hate the way that clothing shops fold or tie clothing to make it as small as possible.  It&#8217;s hard enough when I can&#8217;t tell what size it is due to non-standardised labels, I also have to untie items or remove them from their hangers altogether to see how big they really are against me.  That has to be a vanity thing, too&#8230; picking up a top in &#8220;your size&#8221; and holding it up and it looks so small and slim!</p>
<p>Oh, and the sizing thing that seems to go on at the moment where &#8220;larger size&#8221; means &#8220;wider but exactly to scale&#8221; and gives no thought to, for example, larger/deeper breast cleavage or a longer arse, meaning that it fits fine width-wise but either your chest is cut in half or your buttocks bulge out of the top.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: buffpuff</title>
		<link>http://kateharding.net/2007/11/13/marilyns-law/#comment-23131</link>
		<dc:creator>buffpuff</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Nov 2007 13:27:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://kateharding.net/2007/11/13/marilyns-law/#comment-23131</guid>
		<description>I think the &quot;real women&quot; reaction, (spiteful, but eminently understandable in a culture that consistently dehumanises and desexualises fat women and, in doing so encourages self-hatred in women of all sizes), probably arises in reaction to the over-emphasis on one (for the most part, slender, androgynous), body type by the fashion industry. Since this shape is not typical of the vast majority of women, anyone who actively reads fashion magazines gets a blow to their ego every time they turn a page – I have known slender curvy women who considered themselves &quot;fat&quot; simply for having tits and/or an arse – but for the &lt;b&gt;fat&lt;/b&gt; woman who reads those magazines, the blow is double. Not only are they painfully aware that they fall foul of the preferred body type;  the clothes featured aren&#039;t even available in their size. In short, just by taking an interest in fashion, they are buying in to a culture that re-enforces their feelings of worthlessness. And what goes on in the magazines translates into the point of sale displays on the high street. Wherever we go we&#039;re dogged by visions of tall skinny women. We&#039;re also encouraged by cheap supermarket check-out rags to externalise the self-hatred fostered by this non-stop indoctrination our bodies are &quot;wrong&quot; by sniping at celebrities&#039; bodies. Again, it&#039;s not healthy for anyone to do this, but it&#039;s understandable, and the poison that fuels it affects most of us to a greater or lesser degree. That&#039;s why we bitch to and about each other; it&#039;s why we bitch about our own fat and why, when we cease bitching about our own fat, we still retain the bitch within and want to lash out at the physical stereotype that has been used to dehumanise us all our lives.

Incidentally, my cousin is a stylist and once worked on a fashion shoot where one of the samples supplied didn&#039;t even fit the slenderest model they had; they wound up shooting it on a 9 year-old. Real woman? Discuss.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think the &#8220;real women&#8221; reaction, (spiteful, but eminently understandable in a culture that consistently dehumanises and desexualises fat women and, in doing so encourages self-hatred in women of all sizes), probably arises in reaction to the over-emphasis on one (for the most part, slender, androgynous), body type by the fashion industry. Since this shape is not typical of the vast majority of women, anyone who actively reads fashion magazines gets a blow to their ego every time they turn a page – I have known slender curvy women who considered themselves &#8220;fat&#8221; simply for having tits and/or an arse – but for the <b>fat</b> woman who reads those magazines, the blow is double. Not only are they painfully aware that they fall foul of the preferred body type;  the clothes featured aren&#8217;t even available in their size. In short, just by taking an interest in fashion, they are buying in to a culture that re-enforces their feelings of worthlessness. And what goes on in the magazines translates into the point of sale displays on the high street. Wherever we go we&#8217;re dogged by visions of tall skinny women. We&#8217;re also encouraged by cheap supermarket check-out rags to externalise the self-hatred fostered by this non-stop indoctrination our bodies are &#8220;wrong&#8221; by sniping at celebrities&#8217; bodies. Again, it&#8217;s not healthy for anyone to do this, but it&#8217;s understandable, and the poison that fuels it affects most of us to a greater or lesser degree. That&#8217;s why we bitch to and about each other; it&#8217;s why we bitch about our own fat and why, when we cease bitching about our own fat, we still retain the bitch within and want to lash out at the physical stereotype that has been used to dehumanise us all our lives.</p>
<p>Incidentally, my cousin is a stylist and once worked on a fashion shoot where one of the samples supplied didn&#8217;t even fit the slenderest model they had; they wound up shooting it on a 9 year-old. Real woman? Discuss.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: wriggles</title>
		<link>http://kateharding.net/2007/11/13/marilyns-law/#comment-23123</link>
		<dc:creator>wriggles</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Nov 2007 11:51:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://kateharding.net/2007/11/13/marilyns-law/#comment-23123</guid>
		<description>Sammy, I&#039;m not entirely sure that fat women are the main players behind things such as &#039;real&#039; women thing. For that to work fat women&#039;s opinion would have to matter, who does our opinion matter to exactly?

I think that fat in terms of definition is not simple. Fat is used to describe people that are simply not thin or slim. They have returned fire, they do often do it differently to what a lot of us would, they experience body issues differently to us and have not been subject to the same mindwarp to us, so don&#039;t tend to notice how crass real women sounds. It&#039;s something I&#039;ve never had any time for, it is irrelevant to me, but it is obviously an attempt to raise ones self esteem when one is being told that your inferior, so your response is likely be, no people like you are inferior and so on, not very high toned but then none of this body hate stuff is. 
Yes some fat women go along with this, you can&#039;t blame them for snatching at being able to defend themselves for once instead of feeling undone all the time by the constant barrage of insults.

We are all a bit ignorant of experience that is not our own and we fatties have some misunderstandings about slim people no doubt, a lot of it comes out of their own mouths. A lot of them grab hold of this superiority with both hands and attempt to fashion their narrative in these terms, not knowing what it&#039;s like to be slim in my adult life, it&#039;s sometimes hard to tell the truth from a carry on.

I hope I don&#039;t sound like I think I&#039;m blameless I can think of many mistakes made.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sammy, I&#8217;m not entirely sure that fat women are the main players behind things such as &#8216;real&#8217; women thing. For that to work fat women&#8217;s opinion would have to matter, who does our opinion matter to exactly?</p>
<p>I think that fat in terms of definition is not simple. Fat is used to describe people that are simply not thin or slim. They have returned fire, they do often do it differently to what a lot of us would, they experience body issues differently to us and have not been subject to the same mindwarp to us, so don&#8217;t tend to notice how crass real women sounds. It&#8217;s something I&#8217;ve never had any time for, it is irrelevant to me, but it is obviously an attempt to raise ones self esteem when one is being told that your inferior, so your response is likely be, no people like you are inferior and so on, not very high toned but then none of this body hate stuff is.<br />
Yes some fat women go along with this, you can&#8217;t blame them for snatching at being able to defend themselves for once instead of feeling undone all the time by the constant barrage of insults.</p>
<p>We are all a bit ignorant of experience that is not our own and we fatties have some misunderstandings about slim people no doubt, a lot of it comes out of their own mouths. A lot of them grab hold of this superiority with both hands and attempt to fashion their narrative in these terms, not knowing what it&#8217;s like to be slim in my adult life, it&#8217;s sometimes hard to tell the truth from a carry on.</p>
<p>I hope I don&#8217;t sound like I think I&#8217;m blameless I can think of many mistakes made.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Eleanor Blair</title>
		<link>http://kateharding.net/2007/11/13/marilyns-law/#comment-23115</link>
		<dc:creator>Eleanor Blair</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Nov 2007 10:33:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://kateharding.net/2007/11/13/marilyns-law/#comment-23115</guid>
		<description>Oh and Gap use american sizes on their clothes even when they sell them in the UK, and I definitely found that a Gap 12 was a UK 16 when I was that size briefly in 2002.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh and Gap use american sizes on their clothes even when they sell them in the UK, and I definitely found that a Gap 12 was a UK 16 when I was that size briefly in 2002.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Eleanor Blair</title>
		<link>http://kateharding.net/2007/11/13/marilyns-law/#comment-23114</link>
		<dc:creator>Eleanor Blair</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Nov 2007 10:32:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://kateharding.net/2007/11/13/marilyns-law/#comment-23114</guid>
		<description>Dee: as with everything it varies.  The trousers I&#039;m wearing right now are from La redoute, and are labelled in European, UK and US sizes.  They&#039;re labelled as a 24 UK and a 20 US.

Oh hang on no, today I&#039;m wearing the M&amp;S UK size 22 ones which are almost exactly the same fit.  This is about as big as any &quot;regular&quot; store goes at the moment, and a lot bigger than they did 10 years ago when you were lucky to get an 18.  I know, cos at that point I was an 18 :-)

But yes, in general I&#039;ve been led to consider my US size to be 1-2 sizes smaller than my UK size - depending on manufacturer.

I get completely muddled by the US misses/junior/W sizing though.  It used to be the case that you didn&#039;t get it so much here because you wouldn&#039;t get the same store doing a separate plus range, but looking at M&amp;S&#039;s webpage recently the 20 in the plus range had different waist and hip measurements to the 20 in the normal range.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dee: as with everything it varies.  The trousers I&#8217;m wearing right now are from La redoute, and are labelled in European, UK and US sizes.  They&#8217;re labelled as a 24 UK and a 20 US.</p>
<p>Oh hang on no, today I&#8217;m wearing the M&amp;S UK size 22 ones which are almost exactly the same fit.  This is about as big as any &#8220;regular&#8221; store goes at the moment, and a lot bigger than they did 10 years ago when you were lucky to get an 18.  I know, cos at that point I was an 18 :-)</p>
<p>But yes, in general I&#8217;ve been led to consider my US size to be 1-2 sizes smaller than my UK size &#8211; depending on manufacturer.</p>
<p>I get completely muddled by the US misses/junior/W sizing though.  It used to be the case that you didn&#8217;t get it so much here because you wouldn&#8217;t get the same store doing a separate plus range, but looking at M&amp;S&#8217;s webpage recently the 20 in the plus range had different waist and hip measurements to the 20 in the normal range.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dee</title>
		<link>http://kateharding.net/2007/11/13/marilyns-law/#comment-23058</link>
		<dc:creator>Dee</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Nov 2007 01:45:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://kateharding.net/2007/11/13/marilyns-law/#comment-23058</guid>
		<description>I just have to set the British / American sizing thing straight.  I go to the UK a lot.  My husband is from Scotland.  I wear a misses 18/20 or a 16/18W in the US.  In the UK, I wear anything from an 18 to a 22 (regular sizes, not plus - &#039;cause I can find my size in a lot of regular stores there).  There&#039;s a one size difference, not two, and certainly not more than two.  I have clothes in my closet that fit me right now that are UK sizes 18 and 20, and US sizes 18, 16W, and 18W.  (The plus - W - sizes run a size bigger than regular US sizes).  Honestly, the Brits are not wearing sizes that are tiny compared to ours, and there hasn&#039;t been as much size inflation as some people think.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I just have to set the British / American sizing thing straight.  I go to the UK a lot.  My husband is from Scotland.  I wear a misses 18/20 or a 16/18W in the US.  In the UK, I wear anything from an 18 to a 22 (regular sizes, not plus &#8211; &#8217;cause I can find my size in a lot of regular stores there).  There&#8217;s a one size difference, not two, and certainly not more than two.  I have clothes in my closet that fit me right now that are UK sizes 18 and 20, and US sizes 18, 16W, and 18W.  (The plus &#8211; W &#8211; sizes run a size bigger than regular US sizes).  Honestly, the Brits are not wearing sizes that are tiny compared to ours, and there hasn&#8217;t been as much size inflation as some people think.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sammy</title>
		<link>http://kateharding.net/2007/11/13/marilyns-law/#comment-22920</link>
		<dc:creator>Sammy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Nov 2007 20:45:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://kateharding.net/2007/11/13/marilyns-law/#comment-22920</guid>
		<description>I couldn&#039;t agree more, Kate. That &quot;Marilyn Monroe is a size 14&quot; thing has always bugged me. I would cringe whenever a SA activist would use it. But t this post got me thinking, what other arguments do SA activists use that do more harm than good?

As has been mentioned, using &quot;curvy&quot; or &quot;real&quot; to mean fat is a bad idea. Not only are they linguistically inaccurate, but calling fat women &quot;real&quot; is insulting as well. There are curvy thin and curvy fat people, as well as thin and fat people who aren&#039;t curvy. 

I also thnk it&#039;s a bad idea to act as though all thin people (which usually means all thin women, since just because you believe in size acceptance doesn&#039;t mean you haven&#039;t internalized our culture&#039;s sexism) are shallow, vain, slaves to the fashin industry who never read anything more challenging that Us Weekly. That&#039;s just as false as the image of fat people eating ice cream while watching soaps. 

Anything else?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I couldn&#8217;t agree more, Kate. That &#8220;Marilyn Monroe is a size 14&#8243; thing has always bugged me. I would cringe whenever a SA activist would use it. But t this post got me thinking, what other arguments do SA activists use that do more harm than good?</p>
<p>As has been mentioned, using &#8220;curvy&#8221; or &#8220;real&#8221; to mean fat is a bad idea. Not only are they linguistically inaccurate, but calling fat women &#8220;real&#8221; is insulting as well. There are curvy thin and curvy fat people, as well as thin and fat people who aren&#8217;t curvy. </p>
<p>I also thnk it&#8217;s a bad idea to act as though all thin people (which usually means all thin women, since just because you believe in size acceptance doesn&#8217;t mean you haven&#8217;t internalized our culture&#8217;s sexism) are shallow, vain, slaves to the fashin industry who never read anything more challenging that Us Weekly. That&#8217;s just as false as the image of fat people eating ice cream while watching soaps. </p>
<p>Anything else?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: spacedcowgirl</title>
		<link>http://kateharding.net/2007/11/13/marilyns-law/#comment-22875</link>
		<dc:creator>spacedcowgirl</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Nov 2007 18:17:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://kateharding.net/2007/11/13/marilyns-law/#comment-22875</guid>
		<description>Ah! I didn&#039;t even see &quot;fatastrophizing&quot;! Awesome!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ah! I didn&#8217;t even see &#8220;fatastrophizing&#8221;! Awesome!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: fillyjonk</title>
		<link>http://kateharding.net/2007/11/13/marilyns-law/#comment-22861</link>
		<dc:creator>fillyjonk</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Nov 2007 17:24:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://kateharding.net/2007/11/13/marilyns-law/#comment-22861</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;And I forgot to compliment Meowser on “fatastrophizing” the other day.&lt;/i&gt;

I don&#039;t know how I missed that but it just gave me the vapors.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>And I forgot to compliment Meowser on “fatastrophizing” the other day.</i></p>
<p>I don&#8217;t know how I missed that but it just gave me the vapors.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
