<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Oh, Man.</title>
	<atom:link href="http://kateharding.net/2007/10/03/oh-man/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://kateharding.net/2007/10/03/oh-man/</link>
	<description>2007-2010</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 15 Jul 2010 02:13:02 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Messages of inspiration today &#171; Eileen the Episcopalifem: Liberal, Progressive, Feminist, Episcopalian</title>
		<link>http://kateharding.net/2007/10/03/oh-man/#comment-14988</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Messages of inspiration today &#171; Eileen the Episcopalifem: Liberal, Progressive, Feminist, Episcopalian]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Oct 2007 15:12:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://kateharding.net/2007/10/03/oh-man/#comment-14988</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] Kate is still at it. Like that&#8217;s a surprise to you: It&#8217;s like conversations with evangelists, for real. When someone asks if you have a personal relationship with Jesus, the only correct answer is &#8220;Yes&#8221; — they believe any other answer invites them to tell you why you&#8217;re wrong and need their help. You didn&#8217;t ask for the confrontation, and it&#8217;s clearly none of their fucking business. But you get forced into an adversarial conversation with a stranger, because that stranger is absolutely certain you NEED TO BE INFORMED. Because in their world, only the ignorant could possibly reject their religion. [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Kate is still at it. Like that&#8217;s a surprise to you: It&#8217;s like conversations with evangelists, for real. When someone asks if you have a personal relationship with Jesus, the only correct answer is &#8220;Yes&#8221; — they believe any other answer invites them to tell you why you&#8217;re wrong and need their help. You didn&#8217;t ask for the confrontation, and it&#8217;s clearly none of their fucking business. But you get forced into an adversarial conversation with a stranger, because that stranger is absolutely certain you NEED TO BE INFORMED. Because in their world, only the ignorant could possibly reject their religion. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bellyrolls</title>
		<link>http://kateharding.net/2007/10/03/oh-man/#comment-14937</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[bellyrolls]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Oct 2007 20:15:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://kateharding.net/2007/10/03/oh-man/#comment-14937</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[My weight goes down 5lbs overnight through sweating and peeing. What the hell is 5lbs? My body is not even AWARE of 5lbs more or less. It does notice the effects of the fucking eating disorder I caught from people who told me how revoltingly fat I was, though.

Oh, and I just lurve being labelled female, too. That never makes me want to claw my own skin off or anything.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My weight goes down 5lbs overnight through sweating and peeing. What the hell is 5lbs? My body is not even AWARE of 5lbs more or less. It does notice the effects of the fucking eating disorder I caught from people who told me how revoltingly fat I was, though.</p>
<p>Oh, and I just lurve being labelled female, too. That never makes me want to claw my own skin off or anything.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dee</title>
		<link>http://kateharding.net/2007/10/03/oh-man/#comment-14849</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Dee]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 07 Oct 2007 15:21:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://kateharding.net/2007/10/03/oh-man/#comment-14849</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Em-  Thanks!  Nice to meet you, too.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Em-  Thanks!  Nice to meet you, too.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: kateharding</title>
		<link>http://kateharding.net/2007/10/03/oh-man/#comment-14755</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[kateharding]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 06 Oct 2007 14:54:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://kateharding.net/2007/10/03/oh-man/#comment-14755</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Col, I gotcha. :) No apologies necessary!

I think people interpreted your previous comment as &quot;Why are you talking about this stupid bullshit?&quot; not &quot;Why do people even care, in the long run?&quot;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Col, I gotcha. :) No apologies necessary!</p>
<p>I think people interpreted your previous comment as &#8220;Why are you talking about this stupid bullshit?&#8221; not &#8220;Why do people even care, in the long run?&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: colio2007</title>
		<link>http://kateharding.net/2007/10/03/oh-man/#comment-14706</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[colio2007]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 06 Oct 2007 04:55:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://kateharding.net/2007/10/03/oh-man/#comment-14706</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[yeah i was defending kate (or so i thought, a foolish reader was i).

but i DO think the grammar hangup is stupid, generally. 

if what you&#039;re saying is valuable it doesn&#039;t matter what professional stamp of approval&#039;s placed on it -- be it king james english or street slang. degrees don&#039;t matter either -- so many institutions promote obedient mediocrity and conformist thinking. 

it&#039;s the content counts. and i apologize for morphing onto this darling personal tangent. 

that said, rock on, sisters!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>yeah i was defending kate (or so i thought, a foolish reader was i).</p>
<p>but i DO think the grammar hangup is stupid, generally. </p>
<p>if what you&#8217;re saying is valuable it doesn&#8217;t matter what professional stamp of approval&#8217;s placed on it &#8212; be it king james english or street slang. degrees don&#8217;t matter either &#8212; so many institutions promote obedient mediocrity and conformist thinking. </p>
<p>it&#8217;s the content counts. and i apologize for morphing onto this darling personal tangent. </p>
<p>that said, rock on, sisters!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sweetmachine</title>
		<link>http://kateharding.net/2007/10/03/oh-man/#comment-14669</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[sweetmachine]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Oct 2007 23:44:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://kateharding.net/2007/10/03/oh-man/#comment-14669</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Dimmerman, here&#039;s my MLA/Chicago-influenced answers:

-- &quot;hello,&quot; is correct.

-- You do not need a comma in the &quot;Zzz...&quot; sentence because what follows the &quot;but&quot; is not an independent clause (i.e., it doesn&#039;t have its own subject-verb combo; it just has the verb &quot;heard,&quot; the subject of which is &quot;I&quot; from the first half of the sentence. :-D]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dimmerman, here&#8217;s my MLA/Chicago-influenced answers:</p>
<p>&#8211; &#8220;hello,&#8221; is correct.</p>
<p>&#8211; You do not need a comma in the &#8220;Zzz&#8230;&#8221; sentence because what follows the &#8220;but&#8221; is not an independent clause (i.e., it doesn&#8217;t have its own subject-verb combo; it just has the verb &#8220;heard,&#8221; the subject of which is &#8220;I&#8221; from the first half of the sentence. :-D</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dani</title>
		<link>http://kateharding.net/2007/10/03/oh-man/#comment-14666</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Dani]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Oct 2007 23:41:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://kateharding.net/2007/10/03/oh-man/#comment-14666</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;i&gt;APA/Chicago rumble?&lt;/i&gt;

MLA plays winner, perhaps?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>APA/Chicago rumble?</i></p>
<p>MLA plays winner, perhaps?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nomie</title>
		<link>http://kateharding.net/2007/10/03/oh-man/#comment-14663</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Nomie]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Oct 2007 23:17:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://kateharding.net/2007/10/03/oh-man/#comment-14663</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[APA/Chicago rumble?

I&#039;m gonna be over here on the sidelines, snapping my fingers and humming a tritone-based melody.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>APA/Chicago rumble?</p>
<p>I&#8217;m gonna be over here on the sidelines, snapping my fingers and humming a tritone-based melody.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dimmerman</title>
		<link>http://kateharding.net/2007/10/03/oh-man/#comment-14655</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Dimmerman]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Oct 2007 22:34:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://kateharding.net/2007/10/03/oh-man/#comment-14655</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Okay, okay, you guys are driving me batshit crazy with the comma thing. I&#039;m not a literature person, I come from the programming side.

Here&#039;s a sample sentence I constructed on the fly:

&gt;&gt; Saying &quot;hello&quot;, casually nodding your head, and complete silence are the only three permissible forms of interaction while at a bathroom urinal.

Now it would seem to me that &quot;hello&quot;, is correct rather than &quot;hello,&quot; just because you are isolating/highlighting a single token. Otherwise you would have parsing ambiguities - for a marginally absurd example let&#039;s consider a movie that just opened called &quot;Zzz...&quot;

&gt;&gt; I haven&#039;t seen the new movie &quot;Zzz...,&quot; but heard that it was quite good.

So now how does the reader tell if the movie is called &quot;Zzz...&quot; or &quot;Zzz...,&quot;? If I remember my grammar a comma is optional in the above sentence depending on your style guidelines.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Okay, okay, you guys are driving me batshit crazy with the comma thing. I&#8217;m not a literature person, I come from the programming side.</p>
<p>Here&#8217;s a sample sentence I constructed on the fly:</p>
<p>&gt;&gt; Saying &#8220;hello&#8221;, casually nodding your head, and complete silence are the only three permissible forms of interaction while at a bathroom urinal.</p>
<p>Now it would seem to me that &#8220;hello&#8221;, is correct rather than &#8220;hello,&#8221; just because you are isolating/highlighting a single token. Otherwise you would have parsing ambiguities &#8211; for a marginally absurd example let&#8217;s consider a movie that just opened called &#8220;Zzz&#8230;&#8221;</p>
<p>&gt;&gt; I haven&#8217;t seen the new movie &#8220;Zzz&#8230;,&#8221; but heard that it was quite good.</p>
<p>So now how does the reader tell if the movie is called &#8220;Zzz&#8230;&#8221; or &#8220;Zzz&#8230;,&#8221;? If I remember my grammar a comma is optional in the above sentence depending on your style guidelines.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Katie</title>
		<link>http://kateharding.net/2007/10/03/oh-man/#comment-14567</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Katie]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Oct 2007 19:03:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://kateharding.net/2007/10/03/oh-man/#comment-14567</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Oh man, I know I&#039;m late to this discussion, but I just feel the need to comment SOMEWHERE.  After being so good at avoiding the comments elsewhere, I just clicked over to the site of a blogger who I occasionally read because she graduated from the school I currently go to a couple of years earlier and I think she&#039;s kind of interesting.  Only to find a link to the BMI Project and a &quot;What does she think she&#039;s going on about?  These women ARE TOO FAT!&quot;  followed by &quot;Well, I would too be fat if I were a size 6; you just don&#039;t understand my small frame.&quot;

I don&#039;t think I can read her blog with any kind of respect anymore.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh man, I know I&#8217;m late to this discussion, but I just feel the need to comment SOMEWHERE.  After being so good at avoiding the comments elsewhere, I just clicked over to the site of a blogger who I occasionally read because she graduated from the school I currently go to a couple of years earlier and I think she&#8217;s kind of interesting.  Only to find a link to the BMI Project and a &#8220;What does she think she&#8217;s going on about?  These women ARE TOO FAT!&#8221;  followed by &#8220;Well, I would too be fat if I were a size 6; you just don&#8217;t understand my small frame.&#8221;</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t think I can read her blog with any kind of respect anymore.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

