Comments on: New Layout http://kateharding.net/2007/09/14/new-layout/ 2007-2010 Thu, 15 Jul 2010 02:13:02 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.com/ By: kateharding http://kateharding.net/2007/09/14/new-layout/#comment-11644 Tue, 18 Sep 2007 13:05:44 +0000 http://kateharding.net/2007/09/14/new-layout/#comment-11644 Shit! I’ve heard that from one other person, also IE6. This layout must not be compatible with that.

I’ll contact WordPress about it; there’s really nothing I can change, except the layout. But then Sandy might not be able to read the blog again!

]]> By: Jmars http://kateharding.net/2007/09/14/new-layout/#comment-11641 Tue, 18 Sep 2007 12:34:08 +0000 http://kateharding.net/2007/09/14/new-layout/#comment-11641 Kate — I’m running into the same issue as Becky when I look at the blog from work, where I’m forced to use IE, also version 6.0. No problem when I use Safari on my dear Mac at home.

]]> By: Becky http://kateharding.net/2007/09/14/new-layout/#comment-11594 Mon, 17 Sep 2007 23:21:19 +0000 http://kateharding.net/2007/09/14/new-layout/#comment-11594 I like the design, but trying to open the comments often crashes my browser (IE 6.0). Which didn’t happen with the old layout.

]]> By: kateharding http://kateharding.net/2007/09/14/new-layout/#comment-11478 Sun, 16 Sep 2007 21:34:38 +0000 http://kateharding.net/2007/09/14/new-layout/#comment-11478 tigtog, feel free. I would have stolen Fat Fu’s layout ages ago if it allowed for a custom header. :)

]]> By: tigtog http://kateharding.net/2007/09/14/new-layout/#comment-11475 Sun, 16 Sep 2007 20:53:49 +0000 http://kateharding.net/2007/09/14/new-layout/#comment-11475 Very nice. I might have to update FF101 to this theme, because it’s very clean and easy to read! At least we’ll have a different header.

]]> By: shauna http://kateharding.net/2007/09/14/new-layout/#comment-11459 Sun, 16 Sep 2007 16:06:07 +0000 http://kateharding.net/2007/09/14/new-layout/#comment-11459 I love it… it is pure joy to my eyeballs :)

(and i still cannae believe that Spanx saleswoman… wt fucking f?!)

]]> By: kateharding http://kateharding.net/2007/09/14/new-layout/#comment-11458 Sun, 16 Sep 2007 16:03:00 +0000 http://kateharding.net/2007/09/14/new-layout/#comment-11458 What colors WOULD be your first choices for the body?

Oh, fuck you for making me think.

]]> By: fillyjonk http://kateharding.net/2007/09/14/new-layout/#comment-11454 Sun, 16 Sep 2007 15:45:42 +0000 http://kateharding.net/2007/09/14/new-layout/#comment-11454 I keep meaning to look at the layout, since I learned a little CSS when I was building my old blog. What colors WOULD be your first choices for the body?

]]> By: kateharding http://kateharding.net/2007/09/14/new-layout/#comment-11445 Sun, 16 Sep 2007 12:43:37 +0000 http://kateharding.net/2007/09/14/new-layout/#comment-11445 Apricotmuffins, I hear you. These would not be my first choices, colorwise. (In fact, I had a hell of a time figuring out how to color the header.) But again, everything other than the header and the order of the sidebar widgets is completely beyond my control, unless I A) pay WordPress money and B) learn CSS. WordPress.com is my host (which is awesomely convenient in many ways, annoying in a few others), so I can only use their standard templates.

And since I’ve been waiting forever for them to offer a 3-column layout with reasonably sized type, a customizable header, and no quirks that actively piss me off, I can live with the plainness. :)

]]> By: apricotmuffins http://kateharding.net/2007/09/14/new-layout/#comment-11429 Sun, 16 Sep 2007 08:47:38 +0000 http://kateharding.net/2007/09/14/new-layout/#comment-11429 The colours dont do it for me, im afraid. not the title (the title is great) but the body of the blog feels a bit too… plain. Like someone said, it feels a little like its when the page doesnt work and a ‘search’ thingy comes up instead with stupid links to places. maybe some slight colour in the outer columns would help?

Same content, so everything still good.

]]>