<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Fatsploitation</title>
	<atom:link href="http://kateharding.net/2007/08/29/fatsploitation/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://kateharding.net/2007/08/29/fatsploitation/</link>
	<description>2007-2010</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 15 Jul 2010 02:13:02 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Simone</title>
		<link>http://kateharding.net/2007/08/29/fatsploitation/#comment-9070</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Simone]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 31 Aug 2007 18:00:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://kateharding.net/2007/08/29/fatsploitation/#comment-9070</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Maybe this fat-positive critique of Hollywood in a major Canadian newspaper will cheer your up:
http://www.thestar.com/living/article/251764]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Maybe this fat-positive critique of Hollywood in a major Canadian newspaper will cheer your up:<br />
<a href="http://www.thestar.com/living/article/251764" rel="nofollow">http://www.thestar.com/living/article/251764</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Withheld</title>
		<link>http://kateharding.net/2007/08/29/fatsploitation/#comment-8956</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Withheld]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Aug 2007 19:12:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://kateharding.net/2007/08/29/fatsploitation/#comment-8956</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#039;m reading this article as someone on a loooong waiting list to adopt a child internationally.  I could not adopt from Korea or China, due to their BMI restrictions.  This is happening internationally.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m reading this article as someone on a loooong waiting list to adopt a child internationally.  I could not adopt from Korea or China, due to their BMI restrictions.  This is happening internationally.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mshell67</title>
		<link>http://kateharding.net/2007/08/29/fatsploitation/#comment-8937</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[mshell67]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Aug 2007 16:25:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://kateharding.net/2007/08/29/fatsploitation/#comment-8937</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This whole issue bugs me to no end!!!!  I don&#039;t want to have children, but am all for people who are willing to step up to the plate and take charge!  How dare a governmental agency decided who is &quot;fit&quot; to be a parent (well, I mean child abusers and addicts and such shouldn&#039;t be able to adopt), where does it end?  And it is true that men get treated differently than women when it comes to fat.... I&#039;m 260 at 5&quot;3&#039; and my fiancee is 500 lbs. at 6&#039;4&quot; and they treat him with far more respect than they do me.  When is this madness ever going to end?????]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This whole issue bugs me to no end!!!!  I don&#8217;t want to have children, but am all for people who are willing to step up to the plate and take charge!  How dare a governmental agency decided who is &#8220;fit&#8221; to be a parent (well, I mean child abusers and addicts and such shouldn&#8217;t be able to adopt), where does it end?  And it is true that men get treated differently than women when it comes to fat&#8230;. I&#8217;m 260 at 5&#8243;3&#8242; and my fiancee is 500 lbs. at 6&#8217;4&#8243; and they treat him with far more respect than they do me.  When is this madness ever going to end?????</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sweetmachine</title>
		<link>http://kateharding.net/2007/08/29/fatsploitation/#comment-8925</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[sweetmachine]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Aug 2007 14:51:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://kateharding.net/2007/08/29/fatsploitation/#comment-8925</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Meowser, that&#039;s an interesting point about the different &quot;rules&quot; for showing fatties of different genders--yet another way that women&#039;s bodies are held to untenable standards in our culture.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Meowser, that&#8217;s an interesting point about the different &#8220;rules&#8221; for showing fatties of different genders&#8211;yet another way that women&#8217;s bodies are held to untenable standards in our culture.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: lauredhel</title>
		<link>http://kateharding.net/2007/08/29/fatsploitation/#comment-8921</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[lauredhel]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Aug 2007 14:09:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://kateharding.net/2007/08/29/fatsploitation/#comment-8921</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;blockquote&gt;OhPlease, if we followed this logic, we’d have to shut down the whole damn blogosphere.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

And then the terrists would have...

No, my heart&#039;s not in it.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>OhPlease, if we followed this logic, we’d have to shut down the whole damn blogosphere.</p></blockquote>
<p>And then the terrists would have&#8230;</p>
<p>No, my heart&#8217;s not in it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: fillyjonk</title>
		<link>http://kateharding.net/2007/08/29/fatsploitation/#comment-8913</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[fillyjonk]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Aug 2007 13:22:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://kateharding.net/2007/08/29/fatsploitation/#comment-8913</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;i&gt;They’ll do this crap as long as they’re being rewarded for it. By things like, um, links from widely-read blogs.&lt;/i&gt;

Yeah, that&#039;s right, Laura.  Nobody would EVER read Slate if &lt;i&gt;you&lt;/i&gt; didn&#039;t link to it.  Critically.

Also, we should stop writing letters to the editor.  It just tells them that someone is reading.  In fact, we shouldn&#039;t even read.  All this stuff goes away if you just ignore it!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>They’ll do this crap as long as they’re being rewarded for it. By things like, um, links from widely-read blogs.</i></p>
<p>Yeah, that&#8217;s right, Laura.  Nobody would EVER read Slate if <i>you</i> didn&#8217;t link to it.  Critically.</p>
<p>Also, we should stop writing letters to the editor.  It just tells them that someone is reading.  In fact, we shouldn&#8217;t even read.  All this stuff goes away if you just ignore it!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sweetmachine</title>
		<link>http://kateharding.net/2007/08/29/fatsploitation/#comment-8912</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[sweetmachine]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Aug 2007 13:08:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://kateharding.net/2007/08/29/fatsploitation/#comment-8912</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;blockquote&gt;They’ll do this crap as long as they’re being rewarded for it. By things like, um, links from widely-read blogs.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

OhPlease, if we followed this logic, we&#039;d have to shut down the whole damn blogosphere.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>They’ll do this crap as long as they’re being rewarded for it. By things like, um, links from widely-read blogs.</p></blockquote>
<p>OhPlease, if we followed this logic, we&#8217;d have to shut down the whole damn blogosphere.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dutchy</title>
		<link>http://kateharding.net/2007/08/29/fatsploitation/#comment-8885</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Dutchy]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Aug 2007 07:41:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://kateharding.net/2007/08/29/fatsploitation/#comment-8885</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[O sorry, got the English mixed up, the child would be in a single parent home with his cousin&#039;s wife, not his aunt.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>O sorry, got the English mixed up, the child would be in a single parent home with his cousin&#8217;s wife, not his aunt.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dutchy</title>
		<link>http://kateharding.net/2007/08/29/fatsploitation/#comment-8884</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Dutchy]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Aug 2007 07:38:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://kateharding.net/2007/08/29/fatsploitation/#comment-8884</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Meowser said: “But goddess forbid, in either case, you illustrate with the actual person you’re writing about.” 
So right! I think it has to do with this: with non-celebs - so your average every day real-life person who hasn’t asked for media attention, in this particular case even with a  vulnerable child – if the “funny” writer did portray the actual person he was making fun about, he would get something that’s utterly annoying to him: his jokes wouldn’t be so funny anymore, they would just be hurtful non-jokes.

Slightly off topic, something I still don’t understand in this whole story: this man has a wife, yes? So even *if* he were to fall dead tomorrow (and I don’t believe he will; in the kmbc-tv link you provide, he looks healthy and very cute with the baby that should be his!), the baby would still have a single parent home with his aunt. Wouldn’t that be much better than getting this child into the foster care system, with all its possible problems? 
That question just keeps bugging me. And don’t say it would be traumatic for a child to lose a parent that early (as is of course the underlying argument of the court, although they’d never admit it), of course it would be, but *any* parent can walk under a bus any day, so I don’t think that’s a valid argument anyway.
I do think it’s very traumatic for a child to hear some time in his life that someone loved him very much, but was denied taking care of him because of some arbitrary figure (the wretched BMI again…)]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Meowser said: “But goddess forbid, in either case, you illustrate with the actual person you’re writing about.”<br />
So right! I think it has to do with this: with non-celebs &#8211; so your average every day real-life person who hasn’t asked for media attention, in this particular case even with a  vulnerable child – if the “funny” writer did portray the actual person he was making fun about, he would get something that’s utterly annoying to him: his jokes wouldn’t be so funny anymore, they would just be hurtful non-jokes.</p>
<p>Slightly off topic, something I still don’t understand in this whole story: this man has a wife, yes? So even *if* he were to fall dead tomorrow (and I don’t believe he will; in the kmbc-tv link you provide, he looks healthy and very cute with the baby that should be his!), the baby would still have a single parent home with his aunt. Wouldn’t that be much better than getting this child into the foster care system, with all its possible problems?<br />
That question just keeps bugging me. And don’t say it would be traumatic for a child to lose a parent that early (as is of course the underlying argument of the court, although they’d never admit it), of course it would be, but *any* parent can walk under a bus any day, so I don’t think that’s a valid argument anyway.<br />
I do think it’s very traumatic for a child to hear some time in his life that someone loved him very much, but was denied taking care of him because of some arbitrary figure (the wretched BMI again…)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: OhPlease</title>
		<link>http://kateharding.net/2007/08/29/fatsploitation/#comment-8876</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[OhPlease]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Aug 2007 06:42:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://kateharding.net/2007/08/29/fatsploitation/#comment-8876</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I quit Slate after Saletan&#039;s hateful piece on the &quot;fat is contagious&quot; study. Quit them, emailed them to tell them, and haven&#039;t been back. They&#039;ll do this crap as long as they&#039;re being rewarded for it. By things like, um, links from widely-read blogs.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I quit Slate after Saletan&#8217;s hateful piece on the &#8220;fat is contagious&#8221; study. Quit them, emailed them to tell them, and haven&#8217;t been back. They&#8217;ll do this crap as long as they&#8217;re being rewarded for it. By things like, um, links from widely-read blogs.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

